This should in fact not be an issue with so it build; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn spouse regarding Malise

Regarding the Comyn daughter who was spouse internationalwomen.net tryck på den här länken nu out of Malise off Strathearn, I experienced theorized into the 2005 one to she had been Margaret, recognized as partner away from Sir John de- Keith (select copy regarding blog post lower than) who was 2ndly elizabeth are provided where article: the newest wife Emma I would recommend are of another friends, and never mommy of next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl off Buchan_ , claims to some extent, ‘Malise, Earl of Strathearn, got a spouse Emma, during the 1261-1267, whose surname is actually unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. out-of Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a while in advance of 1270, to make certain that their widow (Margaret) would have been “available” sometime immediately after Emma.

This was naturally a speculation; it can feel the advantage of dealing with a well-known matchmaking ranging from Muriel Keith and you may Reginald ce Cheyne. Anymore associated paperwork perform of course become acceptance.

The brand new membership in the Scots Peerage regarding the category of Keith states out-of Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) that he are thought to possess partnered Comyn, earl of Buchan . It identification, of one’s undecided (“said to was basically”) assortment, may now end up being remedied based on the following the dispensation, dated during the Fondi on fourteen Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Towards the bishop regarding Moray. Faculty to distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, of Moray and Aberdeen dioceses, regarding impediment so you can matrimony due to the 3rd and you can 4th quantities of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the near future 2nd spouse out of Robert Stewart, very first Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), is contracted to help you wed Reginald ce Cheyne, son out of Sir Reginald le Cheyne by his partner (once the her very first partner), Helen off Strathearn. Whenever you are you can find recognized holes regarding the ancestry off Muriel Keith, she and you will Reginald le Cheyne do display a lineage in the Comyns. Although not, this is certainly too faraway to require an effective dispensation in the event that Muriel was a beneficial-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1233), which would be the case in the event the ‘s daughter.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne is actually good-grandson regarding Marjory Comyn, child away from Alexander Comyn, Earl of Buchan (d. 1290), young buck regarding William Comyn mentioned above. Their particular son try Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn away from 1312 so you’re able to his demise inside the 1328 , and you will parent off Reginald.

ca. 1270), was identical to Marjory Comyn, and you may married 2ndly so you can Malise, Earl from Strathearn (d. 1312). This should suggest this new parentage a€?thought to has actually been’ regarding Margaret, partner of Sir John de Keith, was off that age group: she’d n’t have started the fresh d Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, but rather regarding his child Alexander. There is absolutely no proof you to Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn had been hitched much in advance of 1275: while the Lindsay composed,

Discover you to discernable basis on which the connection ranging from Reginald ce Cheyne and Muriel Keith will have existed: in the event that Margaret Comyn, wife off Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The fresh wife from the earl, in the 1275, try titled Marjory, once we understand the attesting clause away from Zero. curriculum vitae., and that’s stated of the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. chap. vi., to own started the following sibling from John Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, which negotiated for Earl Malise the marriage payment significantly more than mentioned [old at the London area, April twenty-six, 1293 to have his child Matilda and you may Robert de- Tony, young man out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de- Quincy E out-of Buchan I __________________I________________ I III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als We E out of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I I We I I I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith E away from = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony We ______I_______________________ We We We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E off Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 I le Cheyne I We We = 2) Sir David I V We We de Graham Sir William de- We We__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We We III I I We I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke out-of Albany)